US-89 (SR-89) over SEVIER RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+38.17173, -112.2635838°10'18" N, 112°15'49" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US-89 (SR-89) over SEVIER RIVER |
Structure number: | 0C 772 |
Location: | EAST EDGE OF CIRCLEVILLE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 79.1 ft. [24.1 m] |
Total length: | 81.7 ft. [24.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 47.2 ft. [14.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 20° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1991 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,525 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 25% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 80.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2017 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1525 | 80.8 |
April 2015 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1506 | 81.0 |
April 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1506 | 81.0 |
April 2011 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1310 | 82.8 |
April 2009 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1310 | 82.8 |
April 2007 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2045 | 80.0 |
June 2005 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 2045 | 80.0 |
June 2003 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1235 | 83.5 |
March 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1175 | 78.4 |
March 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1195 | 78.2 |
May 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1140 | 86.5 |
June 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1495 | 83.9 |
November 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1505 | 83.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 560 | 560 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 3,809 | 3,609 | 200 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 260 | 210 | 50 | 0 | 0 |