SR-16 over WOODRUFF-RANDOLPH CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+41.70493, -111.1594941°42'18" N, 111°09'34" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR-16 over WOODRUFF-RANDOLPH CANAL |
Structure number: | 0D 420 |
Location: | 5.4 MI SO SAGE CREEK JCT |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 17.7 ft. [5.4 m] |
Total length: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.7 ft. [13.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 25° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1935 |
Year reconstructed: | 1938 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,170 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 32% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 59.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 2170 | 59.8 |
August 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2170 | 59.8 |
August 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2124 | 58.7 |
September 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2095 | 68.5 |
June 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2145 | 68.5 |
May 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2145 | 68.5 |
November 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1245 | 71.8 |
November 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1245 | 71.8 |
June 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1905 | 69.5 |
June 1999 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1857 | 64.5 |
May 1997 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1575 | 64.5 |
July 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1320 | 73.8 |
September 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 990 | 76.4 |
September 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 845 | 77.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 85 | 80 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 852 | 827 | 20 | 5 | 0 |