SR-149 over BRUSH CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.40833, -109.3402840°24'30" N, 109°20'25" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR-149 over BRUSH CREEK |
Structure number: | 0D 570 |
Location: | 2.7 MI. NO. OF JCT. US-40 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Total length: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1954 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 810 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 32% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 44.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 810 | 44.2 |
July 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 810 | 53.8 |
July 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 761 | 45.8 |
July 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 735 | 63.5 |
July 2009 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 740 | 57.7 |
July 2007 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2220 | 46.4 |
August 2005 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2220 | 46.4 |
July 2003 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2136 | 46.4 |
June 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2265 | 47.3 |
June 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 2025 | 47.3 |
June 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1750 | 45.3 |
August 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1145 | 46.7 |
May 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 800 | 50.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 72 | 36 | 36 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Other Material Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 100 | 20 | 80 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 1,332 | 1,247 | 40 | 45 | 0 |