SR-128 over BLACK BILL WASH
Map
Coordinates:
+38.60992, -109.5343938°36'36" N, 109°32'04" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR-128 over BLACK BILL WASH |
Structure number: | 0D 580 |
Location: | 5.1 MILES NORTH OF MOAB |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 31.5 ft. [9.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 58.1 ft. [17.7 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1956 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 890 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 25% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 85.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 890 | 85.3 |
September 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 890 | 85.3 |
September 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 833 | 73.7 |
September 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 890 | 61.4 |
September 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 890 | 61.4 |
October 2007 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 690 | 71.4 |
October 2005 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 690 | 71.4 |
October 2003 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 750 | 70.7 |
September 1999 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 775 | 58.5 |
September 1997 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 695 | 65.8 |
November 1995 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 600 | 73.2 |
September 1993 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 575 | 73.4 |
December 1991 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 425 | 74.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 52 | 51 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 116 | 115 | 1 | 0 | 0 |