SR-162 over McELMO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.21834, -109.1908437°13'06" N, 109°11'27" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR-162 over McELMO CREEK |
Structure number: | 0D 710 |
Location: | WEST OF ANETH |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Total length: | 153.9 ft. [46.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 32.5 ft. [9.9 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1963 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,015 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 32% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 54.1 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2015 | 54.1 |
August 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 2015 | 44.1 |
August 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 1917 | 42.9 |
May 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 2003 | 53.4 |
August 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 2003 | 54.7 |
October 2007 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Poor | 1590 | 47.7 |
August 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 1590 | 55.7 |
September 2003 | Poor | Fair | Good | Critical | 915 | 15.5 |
August 1999 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Critical | 890 | 11.5 |
November 1997 | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | Critical | 640 | 19.0 |
November 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 585 | 73.0 |
September 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 570 | 73.2 |
December 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Fair | 560 | 73.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 770 | 760 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 4,959 | 3,472 | 0 | 1,487 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 55 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 65 | 33 | 0 | 32 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 55 | 50 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pile | each | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 59 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Fixed Bearing | each | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Other Material Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 314 | 298 | 16 | 0 | 0 |