SR-153 over BEAVER RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+38.26139, -112.5158338°15'41" N, 112°30'57" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR-153 over BEAVER RIVER |
Structure number: | 0D 817 |
Location: | 8.4 MILES EAST OF BEAVER |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Total length: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.7 ft. [13.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 37° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1950 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Frame [07] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 250 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 33% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 88.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 250 | 88.6 |
February 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 234 | 70.9 |
February 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 275 | 70.2 |
February 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 90 | 82.6 |
March 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 90 | 82.6 |
March 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 105 | 76.8 |
March 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 105 | 76.8 |
March 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 60 | 82.9 |
March 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 60 | 81.4 |
February 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 60 | 77.8 |
February 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 60 | 77.8 |
February 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 40 | 78.1 |
March 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 40 | 82.2 |
February 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 35 | 82.2 |
March 1991 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 30 | 82.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 84 | 0 | 83 | 1 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 1,518 | 1,455 | 21 | 42 | 0 |