SR-10 over COTTON WOOD WASH
Map
Coordinates:
+39.20905, -111.0241639°12'33" N, 111°01'27" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR-10 over COTTON WOOD WASH |
Structure number: | 0F 83 |
Location: | SOUTH END OF CASTLE DALE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
Total length: | 153.9 ft. [46.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 41.0 ft. [12.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1964 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 4,265 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 41% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 85.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4265 | 85.5 |
August 2015 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4265 | 83.5 |
August 2013 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 4060 | 82.6 |
August 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 3815 | 92.1 |
October 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 3815 | 76.4 |
October 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 4389 | 75.9 |
October 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 4389 | 75.9 |
November 2003 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 7140 | 77.7 |
August 1999 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 4055 | 76.1 |
July 1997 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 4050 | 87.7 |
July 1995 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 3710 | 93.2 |
September 1993 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 3425 | 93.4 |
November 1991 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1840 | 95.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 755 | 755 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 6,244 | 6,244 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 83 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Other Material Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 339 | 0 | 339 | 0 | 0 |