Share: 
US-191 (SR-191) over BIG MULE SHOE WASH TUN.
Map
Coordinates:
+38.36017, -109.43472
38°21'37" N, 109°26'05" W
+38.36017, -109.43472
38°21'37" N, 109°26'05" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | US-191 (SR-191) over BIG MULE SHOE WASH TUN. |
| Structure number: | 0V 173 |
| Location: | 4.3 MI.NO. OF LASAL JCT. |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
| Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Total length: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1940 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Main span design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,505 [as of 2014] |
| Truck traffic: | 41% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 80.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2017 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4505 | 80.0 |
| September 2015 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4505 | 61.0 |
| September 2013 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4226 | 80.0 |
| September 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 3740 | 80.0 |
| September 2009 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 3740 | 80.0 |
| October 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 3365 | 80.0 |
| October 2005 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 3365 | 80.0 |
| October 2003 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2965 | 80.0 |
| September 1999 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 3175 | 80.0 |
| September 1997 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 3190 | 80.0 |
| November 1995 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 3005 | 80.0 |
| September 1993 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2530 | 80.0 |
| January 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2265 | 80.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Other Material Culvert | linear ft. | 210 | 210 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1570795
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1570795