I-84 (SR-84) EBL over STODDARD FARM ROAD
Map
Coordinates:
+41.07247, -111.7180041°04'21" N, 111°43'05" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | I-84 (SR-84) EBL over STODDARD FARM ROAD |
Structure number: | 2D 677 |
Location: | 3.9 MI.E.PETERSON INTER. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 80.1 ft. [24.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 41.0 ft. [12.5 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1964 |
Year reconstructed: | 2012 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 11,655 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 41% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 93.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 11655 | 93.2 |
July 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 11655 | 93.2 |
July 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6116 | 86.8 |
July 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7008 | 94.1 |
July 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7008 | 94.7 |
October 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6130 | 92.7 |
November 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6130 | 92.7 |
July 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6233 | 92.7 |
July 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 5920 | 88.7 |
July 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 4683 | 88.8 |
September 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 4163 | 92.7 |
September 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 3715 | 92.7 |
October 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3220 | 93.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 89 | 72 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 81 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 160 | 40 | 120 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 3,290 | 2,300 | 987 | 3 | 0 |