I-70 (SR-70).EBL over SOUTH SALT WASH
Map
Coordinates:
+38.84384, -111.0609938°50'38" N, 111°03'40" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | I-70 (SR-70).EBL over SOUTH SALT WASH |
Structure number: | 2F 99 |
Location: | LONE TREE INTERCHG. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Length of largest span: | 51.2 ft. [15.6 m] |
Total length: | 107.0 ft. [32.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 51.8 ft. [15.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Year reconstructed: | 1989 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,445 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 48% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 80.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3445 | 80.0 |
September 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3445 | 80.0 |
September 2014 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1641 | 57.7 |
September 2012 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1629 | 79.0 |
October 2011 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 2712 | 79.0 |
October 2009 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 2712 | 79.0 |
October 2007 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 2514 | 79.0 |
October 2005 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 2514 | 79.0 |
October 2003 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 2222 | 79.0 |
September 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 1935 | 74.0 |
July 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Good | 1585 | 74.0 |
October 1995 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1490 | 81.9 |
October 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1313 | 83.3 |
November 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1192 | 84.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 727 | 727 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 5,897 | 5,887 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 43 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 110 | 110 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 57 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 246 | 234 | 12 | 0 | 0 |