I-70 (SR-70) EBL over NASH WASH
Map
Coordinates:
+38.94085, -109.4029338°56'27" N, 109°24'11" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | I-70 (SR-70) EBL over NASH WASH |
Structure number: | 2F 268 |
Location: | 0.2 MI E OF W CISCO INTER |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Length of largest span: | 61.0 ft. [18.6 m] |
Total length: | 126.0 ft. [38.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 70.2 ft. [21.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 10° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1971 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 6,970 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 49% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 97.7 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6970 | 97.7 |
September 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6970 | 97.7 |
September 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3312 | 95.0 |
September 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 3235 | 97.9 |
September 2009 | Fair | Fair | Very Good | Good | 3235 | 96.9 |
October 2007 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 3525 | 97.8 |
September 2005 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 3525 | 97.8 |
October 2003 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 3215 | 97.9 |
September 1999 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 2963 | 92.9 |
October 1997 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 2693 | 92.9 |
November 1995 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 2428 | 97.8 |
October 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Satisfactory | 2172 | 96.8 |
January 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Satisfactory | 1992 | 96.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,108 | 1,108 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 8,678 | 8,178 | 500 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 139 | 139 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 68 | 66 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 36 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Other Material Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 332 | 249 | 83 | 0 | 0 |