I-84 (SR-84) WBL over WEBER RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+41.05314, -111.5980241°03'11" N, 111°35'53" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | I-84 (SR-84) WBL over WEBER RIVER |
Structure number: | 4F 122 |
Location: | 0.6 MI.WEST TAGGARTS INT. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Length of largest span: | 80.1 ft. [24.4 m] |
Total length: | 201.8 ft. [61.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 36.7 ft. [11.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 39.7 ft. [12.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 43° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1967 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 8,660 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 55% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 82.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8660 | 82.5 |
July 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8660 | 81.5 |
July 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4126 | 77.9 |
July 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5128 | 96.8 |
July 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5128 | 96.8 |
October 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5115 | 96.8 |
October 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5115 | 96.8 |
July 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5123 | 96.8 |
July 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4865 | 91.8 |
July 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4003 | 91.8 |
September 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3558 | 95.7 |
September 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3170 | 95.8 |
October 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3050 | 83.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 980 | 980 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 7,883 | 7,233 | 650 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 106 | 64 | 42 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 110 | 65 | 45 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 30 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 458 | 335 | 120 | 3 | 0 |