I-70 (SR-70) WBL over NASH WASH
Map
Coordinates:
+38.94155, -109.4029238°56'30" N, 109°24'11" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | I-70 (SR-70) WBL over NASH WASH |
Structure number: | 4F 268 |
Location: | 0.2 MI.E.of W.CISCO INT. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Length of largest span: | 61.4 ft. [18.7 m] |
Total length: | 127.0 ft. [38.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 51.5 ft. [15.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 51.8 ft. [15.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 9° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1971 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 6,970 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 49% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 96.7 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6970 | 96.7 |
September 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6970 | 96.7 |
September 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3312 | 83.0 |
September 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3235 | 87.6 |
September 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3235 | 87.6 |
October 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3525 | 87.6 |
September 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3525 | 87.6 |
October 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 3215 | 87.6 |
September 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 2963 | 82.6 |
October 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 2693 | 82.6 |
November 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 2428 | 88.2 |
October 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 2173 | 86.2 |
January 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 1992 | 86.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 862 | 862 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 6,430 | 5,855 | 575 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 104 | 104 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 52 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 28 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Other Material Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 322 | 322 | 0 | 0 | 0 |