Coleman Mt. Road over Fishpond Creek

Map

Coordinates:
+37.36934, -78.64560
37°22'10" N, 78°38'44" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	Coleman Mt. Road over Fishpond Creek
Structure number:	000000000001605
Location:	0.60-Rt.626/1.90-Rt.618
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	25.6 ft. `[7.8 m]`
Total length:	28.9 ft. `[8.8 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	22.3 ft. `[6.8 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	23.6 ft. `[7.2 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1940
Year reconstructed:	2011
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Good
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	84 `[as of 2014]`
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	94.0

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
September 2017	Good	Good	Very Good	Good	84	94.0
September 2015	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Good	84	94.0
September 2013	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Good	90	94.0
September 2011	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Good	87	94.0
April 2010	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Good	87	44.7
March 2009	Poor	Satisfactory	Poor	Good	87	44.7
March 2008	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Good	87	60.7
March 2006	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Good	84	59.7
March 2005	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Good	84	59.7
March 2003	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	84	69.7
March 2002	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	56	69.7
April 2001	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	56	67.8
March 2000	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	56	67.8
March 1999	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	56	62.8
March 1998	Good	Good	Good	Good	87	62.8
July 1996	Good	Good	Good	Very Good	55	62.8
May 1995	Good	Very Good	Good	Good	55	62.8
April 1994	Fair	Very Good	Good	Fair	55	57.8
June 1993	Good	Very Good	Good	Very Good	25	67.8
April 1992	Good	Very Good	Good	Very Good	55	65.3