ROUTE 0609 over DRY RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+38.16044, -79.6543638°09'38" N, 79°39'16" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | ROUTE 0609 over DRY RUN |
Structure number: | 000000000002482 |
Location: | 0.50 TO 670 & 7.10 TO 624 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
Total length: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.6 ft. [8.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 10° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1970 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 99 [as of 2014] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 85.8 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of relocation of road. [32] |
Estimated cost of work: | $105,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 99 | 85.8 |
April 2016 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 99 | 85.8 |
April 2014 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 79 | 85.8 |
April 2012 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 79 | 85.8 |
April 2010 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 79 | 85.8 |
March 2008 | Fair | Excellent | Excellent | Fair | 79 | 88.8 |
June 2007 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 79 | 69.8 |
June 2006 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 79 | 69.8 |
June 2005 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 79 | 72.0 |
June 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 79 | 88.0 |
June 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 72 | 88.0 |
July 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 72 | 85.0 |
July 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 72 | 85.0 |
June 1996 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 59 | 85.0 |
July 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 59 | 86.0 |
June 1992 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 46 | 97.0 |
June 1990 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 46 | 97.0 |