Share:

Manteo Road over Sycamore Creek

Map

Coordinates:
+37.67865, -78.66599
37°40'43" N, 78°39'58" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Manteo Road over Sycamore Creek
Structure number:000000000004032
Location:2.00-Rt.737/1.10-Rt.604
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Total length:113.2 ft. [34.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1952
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:222 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:57.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,125,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2017FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory22257.4
February 2016FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory22257.4
February 2015FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory30055.7
February 2014FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory22457.3
February 2013FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory22457.3
February 2011FairGoodSatisfactoryGood29666.8
February 2009FairGoodSatisfactoryGood29677.4
March 2007FairGoodSatisfactoryGood25582.4
February 2005GoodGoodGoodGood24783.9
February 2003GoodGoodGoodGood24483.9
March 2001GoodGoodGoodGood24480.9
March 1999GoodGoodGoodVery Good25380.4
February 1997FairGoodSatisfactoryVery Good36380.2
February 1995GoodGoodGoodVery Good36380.2
March 1993GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good29180.3
February 1991PoorSatisfactoryGoodPoor31653.3