Share:

Paynes Pond Rd. over Little George Creek

Map

Coordinates:
+37.74267, -78.46309
37°44'34" N, 78°27'47" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Paynes Pond Rd. over Little George Creek
Structure number:000000000004118
Location:2.10-Rt.20 / 0.90-Rt.784
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:55.8 ft. [17.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1948
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Epoxy Overlay [5]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:98 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:46.3
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$389,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2018FairGoodSatisfactoryGood9846.3
August 2017FairGoodSatisfactoryGood9846.3
August 2016FairGoodSatisfactoryGood9846.3
August 2015FairGoodSatisfactoryGood9846.3
August 2014FairGoodSatisfactoryGood14042.2
August 2013FairGoodSatisfactoryGood14042.2
August 2012FairGoodSatisfactoryGood10142.3
August 2011FairGoodSatisfactoryGood10142.3
August 2010FairGoodSatisfactoryGood10162.4
August 2009FairGoodSatisfactoryGood10162.4
August 2008FairGoodSatisfactoryGood10165.4
August 2007FairGoodSatisfactoryGood10165.4
August 2006FairGoodSatisfactoryGood7769.4
September 2005FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7750.2
August 2004FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7750.2
August 2003FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7350.2
August 2002FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7349.2
August 2001FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood7347.2
August 2000FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood6947.3
November 1999FairSatisfactoryGoodGood6942.2
September 1998FairSatisfactoryGoodGood6442.2
August 1997FairSatisfactoryGoodGood7342.2
September 1996FairSatisfactoryGoodGood6842.2
August 1995FairSatisfactoryGoodGood6842.2
July 1994GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good6842.2
October 1993GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good7542.2
September 1992GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good6958.0
October 1991GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good6956.5