Sugar Fork Road over Willis River
Map
Coordinates:
+37.62681, -78.2192337°37'37" N, 78°13'09" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Sugar Fork Road over Willis River |
Structure number: | 000000000005732 |
Location: | 0.20-Rt.613 /1.30-Rt. 615 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 42.3 ft. [12.9 m] |
Total length: | 137.1 ft. [41.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.3 ft. [7.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1974 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 60 [as of 2014] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 84.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 60 | 84.8 |
December 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 55 | 84.9 |
December 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 60 | 84.8 |
December 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 60 | 84.8 |
December 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 60 | 84.8 |
December 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 60 | 84.8 |
January 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 60 | 84.8 |
January 2005 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 64 | 95.9 |
December 2002 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 56 | 96.9 |
December 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 51 | 91.9 |
December 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 51 | 91.9 |
December 1996 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 53 | 91.9 |
December 1994 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 53 | 91.9 |
December 1992 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 49 | 91.9 |
November 1990 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 49 | 91.9 |