DANTE MTN. ROAD over BIG BRANCH @ FREMONT

Map

Coordinates:
+37.12280, -82.38608
37°07'22" N, 82°23'10" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	DANTE MTN. ROAD over BIG BRANCH @ FREMONT
Structure number:	000000000005780
Location:	.19 TO R83&14.41 FR RCL
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Major Collector (Rural) `[07]`
Length of largest span:	34.5 ft. `[10.5 m]`
Total length:	34.5 ft. `[10.5 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	24.0 ft. `[7.3 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	34.5 ft. `[10.5 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1950
Year reconstructed:	2010
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod `[6]`
Main span material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main span design:	Slab `[01]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	2,548 `[as of 2014]`
Truck traffic:	26% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. `[6]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	68.4
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$134,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
June 2018	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	2548	68.4
June 2016	Good	Good	Good	Good	2548	68.4
June 2014	Good	Good	Good	Good	2738	67.5
June 2012	Good	Good	Good	Good	2738	79.7
June 2010	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Good	2738	79.7
January 2010	Poor	Fair	Poor	Good	2738	28.8
January 2009	Poor	Fair	Poor	Good	2731	28.8
January 2008	Poor	Fair	Poor	Good	2709	28.9
January 2007	Poor	Fair	Poor	Good	2395	29.4
January 2006	Poor	Fair	Poor	Good	2431	29.4
January 2005	Poor	Fair	Poor	Good	2420	29.4
February 2004	Poor	Fair	Poor	Good	2683	28.9
January 2003	Poor	Fair	Poor	Good	2703	28.9
February 2002	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	2703	49.3
January 2001	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	2723	49.2
January 2000	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	2723	51.4
January 1999	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	2000	53.4
March 1996	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	1900	71.2
January 1994	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	1805	66.0
January 1992	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Good	2420	54.0