BOYDTON PLANK SBL over STONY CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.06706, -77.6027237°04'01" N, 77°36'10" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | BOYDTON PLANK SBL over STONY CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000005909 |
Location: | 0.11 Fr 656 & 0.82 To 647 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 89.9 ft. [27.4 m] |
Total length: | 166.7 ft. [50.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.6 ft. [7.8 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 14.8 ft. [4.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1926 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Thru [12] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,172 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 46.3 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $265,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1172 | 46.3 |
September 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1172 | 46.3 |
September 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1172 | 46.3 |
September 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1172 | 46.3 |
September 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1118 | 46.3 |
September 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1118 | 46.3 |
September 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1118 | 44.7 |
September 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1118 | 44.7 |
October 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1118 | 44.7 |
September 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1118 | 44.7 |
September 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1356 | 44.6 |
October 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1257 | 42.8 |
October 2006 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1227 | 42.8 |
September 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1381 | 42.8 |
October 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1352 | 42.8 |
September 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1315 | 42.8 |
September 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1152 | 42.8 |
September 2001 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1156 | 42.8 |
September 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2160 | 42.5 |
December 1999 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2160 | 45.7 |
September 1998 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2100 | 45.7 |
September 1997 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2100 | 45.7 |
September 1996 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1950 | 45.7 |
September 1995 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1950 | 45.8 |
September 1994 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4700 | 45.4 |
September 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 2246 | 46.8 |
September 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 1962 | 59.3 |
August 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 1998 | 59.3 |