ShawsvillePike 653 over Goose Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+37.08619, -80.2047837°05'10" N, 80°12'17" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | ShawsvillePike 653 over Goose Creek |
Structure number: | 000000000007561 |
Location: | 1.81 Rt 660; 1.52 Mont Co |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Total length: | 80.1 ft. [24.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 26.6 ft. [8.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 45° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1978 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 321 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 81.8 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $2,444,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 321 | 81.8 |
May 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 321 | 81.8 |
May 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 316 | 81.8 |
May 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 316 | 81.8 |
May 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 316 | 81.8 |
May 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 316 | 94.8 |
May 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 319 | 94.8 |
May 2004 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 311 | 94.8 |
May 2002 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 317 | 94.8 |
May 2000 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 243 | 97.8 |
May 1998 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 243 | 97.8 |
May 1996 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 202 | 97.9 |
June 1994 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 187 | 97.9 |
June 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 153 | 97.9 |
May 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 153 | 97.9 |