Spangler MillRd682 over Pine Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+36.95087, -80.2844736°57'03" N, 80°17'04" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Spangler MillRd682 over Pine Creek |
Structure number: | 000000000007582 |
Location: | 0.85 RT 686; 1.25 RT 221 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 42.7 ft. [13.0 m] |
Total length: | 46.9 ft. [14.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 13.5 ft. [4.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 25° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1932 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 90 [as of 2014] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 84.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 90 | 84.0 |
June 2016 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 90 | 84.0 |
August 2015 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Good | 90 | 26.2 |
August 2014 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Good | 86 | 26.2 |
August 2013 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Good | 86 | 26.2 |
August 2012 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Very Good | 86 | 43.7 |
August 2010 | Fair | Good | Fair | Very Good | 86 | 56.8 |
September 2008 | Fair | Good | Fair | Very Good | 86 | 56.8 |
October 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 44 | 69.8 |
October 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 50 | 66.8 |
October 2002 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 50 | 66.8 |
October 2000 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 50 | 66.8 |
September 1998 | Good | Excellent | Good | Very Good | 50 | 66.8 |
October 1997 | Poor | Poor | Very Good | Very Good | 68 | 36.0 |
September 1996 | Poor | Poor | Very Good | Very Good | 46 | 36.1 |
September 1995 | Poor | Poor | Very Good | Very Good | 46 | 36.1 |
September 1994 | Fair | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | 46 | 65.8 |
September 1993 | Fair | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | 41 | 65.8 |
October 1991 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 41 | 70.8 |
November 1990 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 40 | 70.8 |