Share:

Reedsville Rd 728 over West Fork Little River

Map

Coordinates:
+36.90135, -80.41263
36°54'05" N, 80°24'45" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Reedsville Rd 728 over West Fork Little River
Structure number:000000000007607
Location:0.40 RT 729; 0.80 RT 743
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Total length:60.4 ft. [18.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:13.5 ft. [4.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:92 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:52.3
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,445,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2018FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9252.3
August 2017FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9252.3
August 2016FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9256.9
August 2015FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9256.9
September 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory8256.9
September 2013FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood8256.9
September 2012FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood8256.9
September 2011GoodGoodGoodGood8256.9
September 2010GoodGoodGoodGood8256.9
October 2009GoodGoodGoodGood8256.9
November 2008GoodGoodGoodGood4756.8
November 2007GoodVery GoodGoodGood4759.8
October 2006GoodVery GoodGoodGood4756.8
October 2005GoodVery GoodGoodGood4956.8
October 2004GoodVery GoodGoodGood4956.8
October 2003GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good4956.8
October 2002GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good4356.8
October 2001GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good4356.8
November 2000GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good4256.8
November 1999GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good4256.8
November 1998GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good4256.8
November 1997GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good3156.8
October 1996GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good4256.8
October 1995GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good4256.8
October 1994PoorVery GoodVery GoodPoor4233.7
October 1993PoorVery GoodVery GoodPoor3033.8
October 1991FairVery GoodVery GoodFair3044.4
October 1990FairVery GoodVery GoodFair3144.4