Park Drive / 61 over Wolf Creek @ Narrows
Map
Coordinates:
+37.32882, -80.8161137°19'44" N, 80°48'58" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Park Drive / 61 over Wolf Creek @ Narrows |
Structure number: | 000000000008335 |
Location: | 0.58-Narrows;0.55-Rte 100 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 72.5 ft. [22.1 m] |
Total length: | 220.2 ft. [67.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 37.4 ft. [11.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1963 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,121 [as of 2014] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 77.2 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $9,342,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 2121 | 77.2 |
January 2016 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 2121 | 79.2 |
January 2014 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 2411 | 78.8 |
January 2012 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 2411 | 78.8 |
January 2010 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 2411 | 78.8 |
February 2008 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 2475 | 68.0 |
February 2006 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 2337 | 68.2 |
January 2005 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 2294 | 68.3 |
February 2004 | Fair | Excellent | Fair | Fair | 2317 | 79.0 |
January 2003 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 3017 | 48.1 |
February 2002 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 2970 | 48.2 |
January 2001 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 1132 | 61.3 |
January 2000 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Fair | 1132 | 61.3 |
February 1999 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 1100 | 61.3 |
February 1997 | Poor | Poor | Very Good | Good | 1100 | 75.4 |
January 1995 | Poor | Poor | Very Good | Good | 1400 | 74.9 |
September 1993 | Poor | Poor | Very Good | Good | 1400 | 74.9 |
September 1991 | Poor | Poor | Very Good | Good | 1325 | 75.0 |
September 1989 | Poor | Poor | Very Good | Good | 1325 | 75.0 |