Share:

Lawrence Drive over Stream

Map

Coordinates:
+36.75153, -76.87603
36°45'05" N, 76°52'34" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Lawrence Drive over Stream
Structure number:000000000010409
Location:0.45 Miles from Route 258
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:30.5 ft. [9.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.3 ft. [7.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1956
Year reconstructed:2016
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:92 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:99.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$74,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
June 2018FairVery GoodVery GoodSatisfactory9299.0
June 2016GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood9299.0
February 2016PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory9238.9
February 2015PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory8938.9
February 2014PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory8938.9
February 2013PoorSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory8952.2
February 2012FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory8968.2
March 2011FairSatisfactoryFairGood8968.2
April 2009FairSatisfactoryFairGood8968.2
May 2008FairGoodSatisfactoryGood7476.2
May 2007FairGoodSatisfactoryGood7476.2
May 2006GoodGoodGoodGood7476.2
June 2005GoodGoodGoodGood6676.2
June 2004GoodGoodGoodGood6676.2
August 2003GoodGoodGoodGood6676.2
June 2002GoodGoodGoodGood6676.2
July 2001FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory6676.2
August 2000GoodGoodVery GoodGood3776.2
July 1999GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good3776.2
July 1998GoodGoodVery GoodGood3776.2
August 1997GoodGoodVery GoodGood3776.2
August 1996FairSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good3776.2
September 1995GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good3778.2
August 1994FairSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good3778.2
August 1993FairSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good6076.2
August 1992FairSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good3876.2
August 1991FairSatisfactoryVery GoodVery Good3876.2