JAMES MADISON PKWY over MACHODOC CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.32462, -77.0940938°19'29" N, 77°05'39" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | JAMES MADISON PKWY over MACHODOC CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000010551 |
Location: | 1.5M RTE206-4.9M RTE205 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 51.8 ft. [15.8 m] |
Total length: | 54.1 ft. [16.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1941 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 7,714 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 68.0 |
Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
Estimated cost of work: | $20,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 7714 | 68.0 |
December 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 7714 | 68.0 |
December 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 7122 | 68.0 |
December 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 7122 | 68.0 |
December 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 7122 | 62.9 |
December 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 8071 | 60.9 |
December 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 7539 | 60.9 |
January 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 7253 | 60.9 |
December 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 6270 | 60.9 |
December 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 6758 | 62.9 |
December 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 8000 | 62.9 |
March 1996 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Very Good | 6500 | 68.0 |
October 1994 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 12000 | 79.0 |
February 1993 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Very Good | 12310 | 64.0 |
January 1992 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Very Good | 6310 | 64.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 315 | 144 | 6 | 163 | 2 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 2,546 | 2,506 | 0 | 0 | 40 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,616 | 1,204 | 400 | 12 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,616 | 1,507 | 101 | 8 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 105 | 87 | 17 | 1 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 108 | 82 | 26 | 0 | 0 |