SNICKERSVILLE ROAD over BEAVERDAM CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.03747, -77.7227839°02'15" N, 77°43'22" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SNICKERSVILLE ROAD over BEAVERDAM CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000011350 |
Location: | 00.09FR731N/00.01TO731S |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 62.0 ft. [18.9 m] |
Total length: | 124.0 ft. [37.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1820 |
Year reconstructed: | 2007 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Masonry [8] |
Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,367 [as of 2014] |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 32.9 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,500,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2018 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 1367 | 32.9 |
February 2017 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 1367 | 32.9 |
February 2016 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 1367 | 32.9 |
February 2014 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 976 | 35.7 |
February 2012 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 976 | 35.7 |
February 2011 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 976 | 35.7 |
October 2009 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 976 | 35.7 |
October 2008 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 1093 | 33.1 |
October 2007 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 996 | 33.2 |
January 2007 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 959 | 2.0 |
October 2005 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 960 | 2.0 |
July 2004 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 893 | 2.8 |
September 2003 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 823 | 3.9 |
January 2002 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 891 | 8.5 |
January 2001 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 1225 | 5.0 |
December 1999 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 1225 | 5.0 |
December 1998 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 1191 | 5.3 |
April 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1191 | 19.5 |
January 1997 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1191 | 25.3 |
June 1995 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 1191 | 25.3 |
July 1994 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 818 | 26.2 |
June 1993 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 818 | 26.2 |
September 1991 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 850 | 12.2 |