Harts Mill Road over South Anna River
Map
Coordinates:
+37.88524, -77.9156237°53'07" N, 77°54'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Harts Mill Road over South Anna River |
Structure number: | 000000000011515 |
Location: | 1.10 Fr 522 & 1.50 To 640 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 80.1 ft. [24.4 m] |
Total length: | 117.1 ft. [35.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1932 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 19 [as of 2014] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 21.9 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $560,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 19 | 21.9 |
March 2017 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 19 | 21.9 |
March 2016 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 19 | 21.9 |
March 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 19 | 21.9 |
March 2014 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 32 | 21.9 |
March 2013 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 32 | 21.9 |
March 2012 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 32 | 38.2 |
March 2011 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 32 | 38.2 |
March 2010 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 32 | 46.2 |
March 2009 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 32 | 45.8 |
March 2008 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 22 | 55.9 |
March 2006 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 22 | 45.9 |
March 2004 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 22 | 45.9 |
March 2003 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 22 | 45.9 |
March 2002 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 22 | 45.9 |
March 2001 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 29 | 45.8 |
March 2000 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 29 | 45.8 |
March 1998 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 34 | 45.8 |
April 1996 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 34 | 45.8 |
March 1995 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 34 | 45.8 |
June 1994 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 43 | 45.8 |
March 1993 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 43 | 45.8 |
March 1992 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 16 | 45.9 |