Belle Meade Road over Little River
Map
Coordinates:
+37.92803, -77.7507437°55'41" N, 77°45'03" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Belle Meade Road over Little River |
Structure number: | 000000000011553 |
Location: | 1.90 From 608&1.40 To 618 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
Total length: | 129.9 ft. [39.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 26.6 ft. [8.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1985 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 487 [as of 2014] |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 61.3 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $210,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 487 | 61.3 |
December 2017 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 487 | 61.3 |
December 2016 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 487 | 61.3 |
December 2015 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Good | 487 | 61.3 |
December 2014 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Good | 463 | 61.3 |
December 2013 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Good | 463 | 61.3 |
December 2012 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Good | 463 | 61.3 |
December 2011 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Good | 463 | 63.3 |
December 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 463 | 81.5 |
December 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 463 | 81.5 |
December 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 463 | 81.3 |
December 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 663 | 81.1 |
December 2006 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 663 | 81.1 |
December 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 663 | 81.1 |
December 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 663 | 81.1 |
December 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 663 | 81.1 |
December 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 663 | 81.1 |
January 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 675 | 81.1 |
January 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 675 | 81.1 |
January 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 675 | 81.1 |
February 1996 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 675 | 80.3 |
January 1994 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 660 | 92.4 |
January 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 369 | 92.7 |