NBL GEO. WASH. PWY over DRAGON RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+37.58515, -76.6033437°35'07" N, 76°36'12" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | NBL GEO. WASH. PWY over DRAGON RUN |
Structure number: | 000000000012085 |
Location: | MID'SEX-GLOUCESTER CL |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Total length: | 112.9 ft. [34.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1931 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 12,000 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 46.3 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,300,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2018 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 12000 | 46.3 |
July 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 6123 | 61.6 |
July 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 5797 | 61.6 |
July 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 5797 | 60.6 |
July 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 5797 | 56.2 |
July 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 5797 | 57.2 |
July 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 6122 | 57.2 |
July 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 6023 | 62.9 |
October 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 5531 | 62.9 |
July 2001 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 5531 | 49.9 |
July 2000 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 4550 | 47.9 |
September 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 4550 | 62.9 |
September 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 6000 | 62.9 |
July 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 12000 | 62.9 |
July 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 6248 | 60.9 |
September 1992 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 5550 | 59.9 |
July 1990 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 5550 | 58.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 452 | 353 | 48 | 51 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 2,814 | 2,492 | 267 | 55 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 2,592 | 2,477 | 115 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 50 | 0 | 48 | 2 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 92 | 37 | 1 | 54 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 50 | 31 | 15 | 4 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 99 | 49 | 0 | 50 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 226 | 75 | 52 | 99 | 0 |