CELLAR CREEK ROAD over LITTLE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.23517, -77.9852437°14'07" N, 77°59'07" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CELLAR CREEK ROAD over LITTLE CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000012859 |
Location: | .98 FR 613 & .2 TO AMEL C |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Total length: | 40.7 ft. [12.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 21.7 ft. [6.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.3 ft. [6.8 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1972 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 430 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 65.8 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $130,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 430 | 65.8 |
March 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 483 | 66.4 |
March 2013 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 483 | 66.4 |
March 2011 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 483 | 66.1 |
March 2009 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 483 | 66.1 |
March 2007 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 396 | 68.2 |
March 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 504 | 77.2 |
March 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 468 | 77.2 |
March 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 470 | 77.2 |
October 1999 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 415 | 50.0 |
September 1997 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 421 | 66.2 |
September 1995 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 423 | 66.2 |
November 1994 | Poor | Good | Good | Poor | 423 | 50.0 |
December 1993 | Poor | Very Good | Very Good | Poor | 353 | 52.1 |
December 1991 | Poor | Very Good | Very Good | Poor | 284 | 52.2 |