Rt 29 NBL Bypass over Route 1156
Map
Coordinates:
+36.54321, -79.4583036°32'36" N, 79°27'30" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Rt 29 NBL Bypass over Route 1156 |
Structure number: | 000000000013513 |
Location: | 0.36-29N Bus/0.32-Rt.786 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12] |
Length of largest span: | 100.1 ft. [30.5 m] |
Total length: | 103.0 ft. [31.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 58.4 ft. [17.8 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 25° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1980 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 7,890 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 16% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 88.2 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,691,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 7890 | 88.2 |
January 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 7890 | 88.2 |
August 2015 | Poor | Good | Poor | Good | 7890 | 71.9 |
August 2014 | Poor | Good | Poor | Good | 16000 | 70.8 |
February 2014 | Poor | Good | Poor | Good | 16000 | 70.8 |
August 2012 | Poor | Good | Poor | Good | 16000 | 70.8 |
February 2012 | Poor | Good | Poor | Good | 7778 | 71.9 |
February 2011 | Poor | Good | Poor | Good | 7778 | 71.9 |
February 2010 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 7778 | 88.2 |
February 2008 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 7717 | 88.2 |
February 2006 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 5823 | 88.4 |
April 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5185 | 94.5 |
February 2002 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5540 | 94.5 |
February 2000 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 4577 | 83.5 |
February 1998 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 4577 | 83.5 |
March 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3100 | 94.7 |
May 1994 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 6500 | 94.5 |
February 1992 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1878 | 94.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 686 | 680 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 9,422 | 9,422 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 6,016 | 6,006 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 5,678 | 0 | 14 | 5,664 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 130 | 79 | 51 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 127 | 0 | 127 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 42 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 42 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 207 | 93 | 114 | 0 | 0 |