EBL Route 360 over NS Railway
Map
Coordinates:
+37.10710, -78.3558037°06'26" N, 78°21'21" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | EBL Route 360 over NS Railway |
Structure number: | 000000000013896 |
Location: | 1.20-Rt 628 / 0.13-Rt 630 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over railroad |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 43.3 ft. [13.2 m] |
Total length: | 131.9 ft. [40.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 34° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1931 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,387 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 13% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 72.7 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,208,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2387 | 72.7 |
April 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 2387 | 62.8 |
April 2014 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 4900 | 65.4 |
April 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2728 | 67.2 |
April 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2728 | 75.7 |
April 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2728 | 76.7 |
April 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2724 | 77.7 |
April 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 2507 | 85.4 |
July 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 2712 | 66.6 |
August 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 2520 | 73.2 |
October 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 2520 | 68.2 |
July 1996 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 2250 | 68.3 |
May 1994 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 4600 | 63.2 |
December 1991 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Fair | 2640 | 66.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 528 | 386 | 109 | 33 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 4,367 | 3,665 | 602 | 100 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 3,696 | 3,661 | 32 | 0 | 3 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 12 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 62 | 57 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 142 | 32 | 107 | 3 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 68 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 37 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 264 | 62 | 10 | 192 | 0 |
Concrete Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 2,112 | 1,056 | 0 | 0 | 1,056 |