GARY'S CHURCH ROAD over INTERSTATE-95
Map
Coordinates:
+37.12673, -77.3579237°07'36" N, 77°21'29" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | GARY'S CHURCH ROAD over INTERSTATE-95 |
Structure number: | 000000000014087 |
Location: | 0.29 Fr 301 & 0.24 To 607 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 60.4 ft. [18.4 m] |
Total length: | 222.5 ft. [67.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.5 ft. [9.0 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 10° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1959 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 630 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 63.9 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $600,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 630 | 63.9 |
August 2017 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 791 | 62.8 |
August 2016 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 791 | 62.8 |
August 2015 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 791 | 62.8 |
August 2014 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 995 | 62.6 |
August 2013 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 995 | 63.6 |
February 2013 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 995 | 63.6 |
February 2012 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 995 | 62.8 |
March 2011 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 995 | 62.8 |
February 2010 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 995 | 62.8 |
February 2008 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1072 | 77.9 |
February 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1072 | 78.9 |
February 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 1072 | 78.9 |
February 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 684 | 80.1 |
March 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 684 | 68.0 |
February 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 684 | 68.0 |
February 1996 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 684 | 67.1 |
March 1994 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | 461 | 78.3 |
March 1992 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | 461 | 80.3 |