Share: 
LONE OAK MILL ROAD over WARDS CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.19352, -77.10987
37°11'37" N, 77°06'36" W
+37.19352, -77.10987
37°11'37" N, 77°06'36" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | LONE OAK MILL ROAD over WARDS CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000000014132 |
| Location: | 0.70 Fr 611 & 0.50 To 616 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
| Total length: | 28.5 ft. [8.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1974 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 90 [as of 2014] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 38.9 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $110,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 2018 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Serious | 90 | 38.9 |
| March 2017 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 90 | 68.8 |
| March 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 90 | 69.0 |
| March 2014 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 75 | 69.0 |
| March 2013 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 75 | 69.0 |
| March 2012 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 75 | 69.0 |
| March 2011 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 75 | 69.0 |
| March 2010 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 75 | 69.0 |
| March 2008 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 87 | 72.0 |
| April 2006 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 87 | 71.0 |
| March 2005 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 96 | 71.0 |
| March 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 78 | 85.0 |
| March 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 74 | 85.0 |
| January 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 74 | 85.0 |
| January 1996 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 74 | 85.0 |
| January 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 89 | 96.0 |
| January 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 21 | 96.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1578646
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1578646