Share: 
DUKE STREET over HOOF'S RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+38.80405, -77.05787
38°48'15" N, 77°03'28" W
+38.80405, -77.05787
38°48'15" N, 77°03'28" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | DUKE STREET over HOOF'S RUN |
| Structure number: | 000000000019936 |
| Location: | 0.85 241 & 0.45 1 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
| Length of largest span: | 17.1 ft. [5.2 m] |
| Total length: | 37.1 ft. [11.3 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1932 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 21,539 [as of 2014] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 82.6 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $3,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 2017 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 21539 | 82.6 |
| January 2015 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 38300 | 80.6 |
| January 2013 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 38300 | 80.6 |
| January 2011 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 38300 | 80.6 |
| January 2009 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 38300 | 80.6 |
| December 2006 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 38300 | 80.6 |
| December 2004 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 38300 | 80.6 |
| October 2002 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 38300 | 80.6 |
| January 2001 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 38300 | 80.6 |
| March 1999 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 38300 | 80.6 |
| December 1996 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 38300 | 80.6 |
| December 1994 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 38300 | 81.5 |
| November 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 14000 | 83.7 |
| November 1990 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 14000 | 83.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 85 | 43 | 42 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1581191
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1581191