Route 29 Bus. over James Street
Map
Coordinates:
+37.39199, -79.1583637°23'31" N, 79°09'30" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Route 29 Bus. over James Street |
Structure number: | 000000000020526 |
Location: | 2.02-NCL Lynch/2.05-Rt128 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12] |
Length of largest span: | 89.9 ft. [27.4 m] |
Total length: | 89.9 ft. [27.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 69.2 ft. [21.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 1° |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1994 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 37,916 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 94.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 37916 | 94.4 |
January 2015 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 37916 | 89.1 |
January 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 44000 | 88.5 |
January 2011 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 43939 | 88.5 |
January 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 43939 | 88.5 |
January 2007 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 42000 | 88.7 |
January 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 42000 | 88.7 |
February 2003 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 42000 | 88.7 |
February 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 42000 | 88.7 |
January 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 42000 | 86.7 |
January 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 42000 | 86.7 |
January 1995 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 42000 | 85.5 |
December 1993 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Poor | 40740 | 47.5 |
December 1991 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | 33560 | 49.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,056 | 0 | 984 | 72 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 9,590 | 0 | 9,270 | 320 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 6,630 | 6,590 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 6,102 | 6,102 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 152 | 114 | 0 | 38 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 152 | 152 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 88 | 0 | 0 | 88 | 0 |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 152 | 3 | 0 | 149 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 352 | 0 | 352 | 0 | 0 |