Bland Blvd. over Lucas Creek


+37.12257, -76.52243
37°07'21" N, 76°31'21" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Bland Blvd. over Lucas Creek
Structure number:000000000020670
Location:0.25 TO 60 / 0.69 TO 143
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1991
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:28,480 [as of 2014]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:74.9

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
January 2017Good7 out of 102848074.9
January 2015Good7 out of 102848074.9
October 2013Fair6 out of 10500081.6
December 2011Good7 out of 10500081.6
November 2009Good7 out of 10500081.6
November 2007Good7 out of 10500081.6
October 2005Good7 out of 10500083.6
November 2003Good7 out of 10500083.6
September 2001Good7 out of 10500083.6
February 2000Good8 out of 10500083.6
September 1997Good8 out of 10500083.6
July 1995Good8 out of 10500083.6
July 1993Good8 out of 10500083.6
December 1991Good7 out of 10500085.0