ROUTE 0011 over PLUM CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.13245, -80.5291637°07'57" N, 80°31'45" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | ROUTE 0011 over PLUM CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000021271 |
Location: | O.85 MI. FROM MONTG. CL. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 132.9 ft. [40.5 m] |
Total length: | 132.9 ft. [40.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 43.3 ft. [13.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 46.6 ft. [14.2 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 2002 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 5,087 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 5087 | 98.3 |
April 2016 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 5087 | 98.3 |
April 2014 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 10000 | 97.6 |
April 2012 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 10000 | 97.6 |
April 2010 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 10000 | 97.6 |
April 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 10000 | 97.6 |
April 2006 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 10000 | 97.6 |
April 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10000 | 97.6 |
May 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 10000 | 75.6 |
May 2001 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Poor | 10000 | 43.9 |
May 2000 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Poor | 10000 | 43.9 |
June 1999 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 10000 | 46.1 |
May 1998 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 8540 | 65.1 |
July 1997 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 8540 | 66.1 |
June 1996 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 8540 | 67.1 |
May 1995 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 8540 | 61.7 |
April 1994 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 8540 | 61.7 |
August 1992 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 8540 | 61.7 |
June 1991 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 8540 | 61.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 795 | 795 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 10,496 | 10,496 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 6,190 | 2,770 | 3,420 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 131 | 101 | 29 | 1 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 87 | 85 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 266 | 233 | 33 | 0 | 0 |