MERRIMAC TRAIL over COLONIAL PKWY
Map
Coordinates:
+37.27691, -76.6813437°16'37" N, 76°40'53" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | MERRIMAC TRAIL over COLONIAL PKWY |
Structure number: | 000000000022338 |
Location: | 0.14SCL WILLI O.76 TO 31 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
Total length: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 1° |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1948 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Other [9] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 6,670 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 79.2 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $284,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6670 | 79.2 |
July 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6670 | 79.2 |
August 2014 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6670 | 79.2 |
August 2012 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7545 | 79.1 |
August 2010 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7545 | 79.1 |
September 2008 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7545 | 79.1 |
December 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7545 | 80.1 |
December 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7545 | 80.1 |
November 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7545 | 80.1 |
December 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7545 | 80.1 |
December 1998 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 7545 | 80.1 |
December 1996 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 7545 | 80.1 |
October 1994 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 7545 | 78.2 |
January 1993 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 8870 | 78.1 |
January 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | 8870 | 77.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 76 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 99 | 99 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other Material Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 99 | 98 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Concrete Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 99 | 0 | 87 | 0 | 12 |