Fourth Street over Gross Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+37.30040, -78.3917037°18'01" N, 78°23'30" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Fourth Street over Gross Creek |
Structure number: | 000000000022435 |
Location: | .10 S Main St/.01 Va St. |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 4.9 ft. [1.5 m] |
Total length: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Skew angle: | 99° |
Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
Year built: | 1932 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,000 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 90.3 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $753,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2000 | 90.3 |
July 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2406 | 89.3 |
July 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2400 | 89.3 |
July 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2400 | 89.3 |
July 2011 | Fair | - | - | - | 2400 | 89.3 |
July 2010 | Fair | - | - | - | 2400 | 67.8 |
November 2009 | Fair | - | - | - | 2400 | 67.8 |
October 2008 | Fair | - | - | - | 2400 | 69.8 |
October 2007 | Fair | - | - | - | 2400 | 69.8 |
October 2006 | Fair | - | - | - | 2400 | 69.8 |
October 2005 | Fair | - | - | - | 2400 | 69.8 |
October 2004 | Fair | - | - | - | 2000 | 70.8 |
October 2003 | Fair | - | - | - | 2000 | 70.8 |
October 2002 | Fair | - | - | - | 2000 | 70.8 |
November 2001 | Fair | - | - | - | 2000 | 68.8 |
December 2000 | Fair | - | - | - | 2000 | 68.8 |
November 1998 | Fair | - | - | - | 2000 | 68.8 |
December 1997 | Fair | - | - | - | 2000 | 68.8 |
December 1996 | Fair | - | - | - | 2000 | 68.8 |
December 1995 | Fair | - | - | - | 2000 | 68.8 |
January 1995 | Fair | - | - | - | 2000 | 70.8 |
December 1993 | Good | - | - | - | 2000 | 70.8 |
December 1992 | Good | - | - | - | 2000 | 70.8 |
March 1992 | Good | - | - | - | 2000 | 70.8 |