OLD LEE HIGHWAY over ACOTINK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.86164, -77.2775938°51'42" N, 77°16'39" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | OLD LEE HIGHWAY over ACOTINK CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000022498 |
Location: | 00.19 50 / 01.89 236 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
Total length: | 130.9 ft. [39.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 86.9 ft. [26.5 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1976 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 13,930 [as of 2014] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 92.9 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $3,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 13930 | 92.9 |
June 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 13930 | 92.9 |
June 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 14500 | 92.8 |
July 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 14500 | 92.8 |
August 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 14500 | 92.8 |
August 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 14500 | 87.8 |
October 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 14500 | 87.8 |
October 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 14500 | 87.8 |
October 2001 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 14500 | 86.8 |
November 1999 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 14500 | 87.8 |
November 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 14500 | 87.8 |
August 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 14500 | 88.1 |
May 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 13700 | 88.4 |
December 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 13700 | 87.4 |