Share:

GRAYSON STREET over CHESTNUT CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+36.66323, -80.92015
36°39'48" N, 80°55'13" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:GRAYSON STREET over CHESTNUT CREEK
Structure number:000000000023869
Location:.04 MEADOW ST .30 MAIN S
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Total length:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:61.7 ft. [18.8 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,290 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:97.8
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$3,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
January 2018GoodGoodGoodGood229097.8
January 2016GoodGoodGoodGood229067.0
January 2014GoodGoodGoodGood719664.2
January 2012GoodGoodGoodGood719664.2
January 2010GoodGoodGoodGood719664.2
January 2008GoodGoodGoodGood719664.2
January 2006GoodGoodGoodGood719664.2
February 2004GoodGoodGoodGood719670.1
January 2002GoodGoodGoodGood719670.1
February 2000GoodGoodGoodGood719670.1
March 1998GoodGoodGoodGood719670.1
April 1996GoodGoodGoodGood719670.1
April 1994GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent719670.3