Dunns Swamp Road over Pitts Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+37.99874, -75.5679537°59'55" N, 75°34'05" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Dunns Swamp Road over Pitts Creek |
Structure number: | 000000000024320 |
Location: | 0.10 Md Line/0.10 to 705 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Total length: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1995 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Main span material: | Aluminum, Wrought Iron or Cast Iron [9] |
Main span design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 62 [as of 2014] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Culvert condition: | Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 73.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 62 | 73.0 |
March 2017 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 62 | 73.0 |
March 2016 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 62 | 73.0 |
March 2015 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 62 | 73.0 |
March 2014 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 51 | 89.0 |
June 2013 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 51 | 89.0 |
August 2012 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 51 | 100.0 |
September 2011 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 51 | 100.0 |
January 2010 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 51 | 100.0 |
January 2008 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 51 | 100.0 |
January 2006 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 82 | 100.0 |
November 2003 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 82 | 100.0 |
November 2001 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 82 | 100.0 |
November 1999 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 71 | 100.0 |
November 1997 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 71 | 100.0 |
October 1995 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 75 | 100.0 |