Reusens Road over Pigeon Creek


+37.44763, -79.17976
37°26'51" N, 79°10'47" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Reusens Road over Pigeon Creek
Structure number:000000000025760
Location:.04 Selene St / .32 Hydro
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Skew angle:51°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1998
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:197 [as of 2011]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:97.0

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
February 2017Good7 out of 1019797.0
February 2015Good7 out of 10197100.0
February 2013Good7 out of 1027099.0
February 2011Good7 out of 10197100.0
February 2009Good7 out of 10197100.0
February 2007Good7 out of 10197100.0
January 2005Good7 out of 10197100.0
December 2002Good7 out of 10-100.0
December 2000Good9 out of 10-100.0
December 1998Good9 out of 10-100.0