GOOD HOPE ROAD over WEST CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.24037, -78.1226437°14'25" N, 78°07'21" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | GOOD HOPE ROAD over WEST CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000025909 |
Location: | 0.49 FR 619 & 1.71 TO 360 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 12.8 ft. [3.9 m] |
Total length: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 43° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1999 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 73 [as of 2014] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 100.0 |
Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
Estimated cost of work: | $322,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2017 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 73 | 100.0 |
February 2015 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 96 | 99.0 |
February 2013 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 96 | 100.0 |
February 2011 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 96 | 100.0 |
February 2009 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 96 | 100.0 |
January 2007 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 65 | 100.0 |
January 2005 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 62 | 100.0 |
January 2003 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 59 | 100.0 |
January 2001 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 60 | 100.0 |
February 1999 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 60 | 100.0 |