Share:

River Ridge Rd 664 over Boothe Creek

Map

Coordinates:
+36.98383, -80.18032
36°59'02" N, 80°10'49" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:River Ridge Rd 664 over Boothe Creek
Structure number:000000000027138
Location:1.27 RT 221; 0.03 RT 639
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:10.2 ft. [3.1 m]
Total length:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:192 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:97.0

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
December 2017Good7 out of 1019297.0
December 2015Good7 out of 1019297.0
December 2013Good7 out of 1021996.9
December 2011Good7 out of 1021999.9
March 2010Good7 out of 1021999.9
March 2008Good7 out of 1021999.9
March 2006Good8 out of 1019898.9
March 2004Good8 out of 1019698.9
March 2002Good9 out of 1026099.9