Share:

LOGGER BRANCH ROAD over BLACK BRANCH/NUL. RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+44.85000, -71.72733
44°51'00" N, 71°43'38" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LOGGER BRANCH ROAD over BLACK BRANCH/NUL. RIVER
Structure number:000053591-00005
Location:S. O. CONTE NFWR-NULHEGAN
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Total length:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:14.4 ft. [4.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:Bureau of Fish and Wildlife [63]
Year built:1960
Year reconstructed:1984
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10 [as of 2017]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:54.7

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
July 2017GoodGoodGoodGood1054.7
July 2015GoodGoodGoodGood1054.7
July 2013GoodGoodGoodGood1054.7
July 2011GoodGoodGoodGood1054.5
July 2009GoodGoodGoodGood1054.5
July 2007GoodGoodGoodGood1054.5
July 2005GoodGoodGoodGood1054.5
July 2003GoodVery GoodGoodGood1055.8
June 2001PoorCriticalGoodGood1023.5
October 2000FairSatisfactoryGoodGood1055.8