Share: 
C3013 over 1ST BRANCH WHITE R.
Map
Coordinates:
+43.92302, -72.46544
43°55'23" N, 72°27'56" W
+43.92302, -72.46544
43°55'23" N, 72°27'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | C3013 over 1ST BRANCH WHITE R. |
| Structure number: | 100913003409131 |
| Location: | 0.1 MI JCT TH 13 + VT110 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 63.0 ft. [19.2 m] |
| Total length: | 70.9 ft. [21.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 13.5 ft. [4.1 m] |
| Vertical clearance above deck: | 7.2 ft. [2.2 m] |
| Skew angle: | 16° |
| Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
| Year built: | 1902 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Main span material: | Wood or timber [7] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 31.7 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $386,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 31.7 |
| November 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 32.7 |
| October 2013 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 33.7 |
| July 2011 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 27.1 |
| July 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 27.1 |
| August 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 50 | 28.2 |
| August 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 55.9 |
| June 2003 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 50 | 37.9 |
| July 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 57.9 |
| August 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 50 | 23.5 |
| September 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 50 | 23.5 |
| December 1995 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 50 | 18.4 |
| November 1993 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 50 | 22.5 |
| August 1991 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 50 | 18.4 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1586315
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1586315