TR 03 FAS 125 over MID. BR WILLIAMS RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+43.26067, -72.5958143°15'38" N, 72°35'45" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | TR 03 FAS 125 over MID. BR WILLIAMS RIVER |
Structure number: | 200125000914072 |
Location: | 0.2 MI S JCT. VT 11 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 97.1 ft. [29.6 m] |
Total length: | 99.1 ft. [30.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.2 ft. [8.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 20° |
Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
Year built: | 1940 |
Year reconstructed: | 2001 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,519 [as of 1999] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 78.3 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $996,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1519 | 78.3 |
June 2016 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1519 | 78.3 |
June 2014 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1519 | 78.3 |
June 2012 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1519 | 78.3 |
April 2010 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1519 | 78.3 |
May 2008 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1519 | 78.3 |
May 2006 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1519 | 78.3 |
June 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1519 | 71.4 |
July 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1519 | 71.4 |
November 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1519 | 71.4 |
July 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1420 | 55.5 |
June 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1420 | 61.4 |
August 1996 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1420 | 67.8 |
August 1994 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1400 | 67.6 |
August 1992 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1400 | 68.7 |
November 1990 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1400 | 66.7 |